For the source text click/tap here: Bava Batra 92
To download, click/tap here: PDF
The sixth chapter opens with a discussion of a sale in which the merchandise does not fulfill the requirements of the buyer. In some cases, a defect in the merchandise entirely nullifies the sale as a mistaken transaction.
In other cases, the defect is considered so common that the buyer should have specified if he did not want it. Similarly, if the merchandise is suitable for several purposes, it may be the responsibility of the buyer to specify the purpose for which he is purchasing the merchandise.
We explore the notion of warranties and Irwin Haut’s analysis of Unjust enrichment.