For the source text click/tap here: Nedarim 29
To download, click/tap here: PDF
On our daf we read "Ulla said: [The Mishna means as follows:] Once they are knocked down, there is no reason for him to redeem them (for their sanctity departs automatically). Rav Hamnuna said to him (Ulla): The sanctity that was placed on them, where did it go? And what if someone said to a woman, “Today you are my wife, but tomorrow you will not be my wife,” does such a woman depart without a get?
[Obviously not! For once she is acquired as his wife, the marriage cannot simply disappear; so too here, the consecration cannot disappear by itself!?]
Rava said to him: How can you compare monetary sanctity (such as the plants) with physical sanctity (as the wife)? Monetary sanctity can depart by itself, while physical sanctity cannot depart by itself!? Abaye said to him (Rava): Is it true that physical sanctity cannot depart by itself? But it was taught in a braisa: If someone vows, “My ox should be a korban olah (burnt offering) for thirty days, and then after thirty days it should be a korban shelamim (peace offering), the law is: For the first thirty days it is an olah, and afterwards it is a shelamim.
We explore the 30 day rule and the new taxonomy of the Olah into shelamim.
What was Rav Kook’s view on sacrifices and how was he misrepresented?